te.ma has been inactive since 1 August 2024 until further notice and is in archive mode. All publications are still accessible. However, the comments section is switched off. Existing user accounts will remain accessible until 31 July 2025, new user accounts can no longer be created. Our newsletter will no longer be updated.

SPECIAL INPUT: Kathrin Wieck

A broad shared understanding of transdisciplinarity

Transdisciplinarity means bridging the gap between science and society. Facing the complex transformation challenges and developing sustainable development solutions, it gained more and more awareness in academic institutions to establish it as a research principle for creating new integrated knowledge and fostering transformation in science and society. What is transdisciplinarity as a research mode, how do we understand it, and how is it related to sustainable development? With a common understanding in the ENHANCE Alliance, we built a framework for transdisciplinary research processes and integrated knowledge exchange between science and society. As the ENHANCE universities each have their own organisational structure and culture, a shared and broad understanding of transdisciplinarity is key to foster the institutionalisation of transdisciplinarity.

Transdisciplinarity

Facing the transformation challenges in the era of climate change demands a stronger focus on sustainable development, innovation, creative imagination and solutions to societal problems. Transdisciplinary cooperation is becoming an essential part of producing the scientific knowledge needed for these transformations.1 This approach calls for immediate action towards societal transformation, aligning with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

The exchange of knowledge, ideas and research questions that address the needs and concerns of both academic and non-academic actors has gained much attention since the global recognition of our planet’s escalating crisis, such as urbanisation, climate change, biodiversity loss, social and political conflicts, land use conflicts and more. Beyond raising public awareness about urgent scientific issues as well as about the practicality of technical solutions adaptable to everyday life, transdisciplinarity for sustainable development encompasses much more: it is a research principle with a problem-oriented approach in a social context.

To tackle these problems, it is crucial to establish ongoing knowledge exchange and collaborative research among science, administration, politics, business and civil society, incorporating diverse types of knowledge, particularly within universities. Since the 1980s transdisciplinarity has been recognized as a scientific principle and mode of knowledge production with a focus on concrete life-world context and implementation.2,3 Furthermore, in scientific literature and in growing communities of inter- and transdisciplinarity (ITD Alliance, ENHANCE Alliance, td-net, tdAcademy, Association for Transdisciplinary and Participatory Research), it is discussed as a means of addressing real-life-problems through integrative knowledge production and participatory research between scientific and non-scientific stakeholders, providing systemic ways to approach societal issues.

Transdisciplinary research also involves the production of new integrated knowledge (in science and practice) and the generation of different types of knowledge.4,5,6,7,8,9,10 This is being developed on an eye level by various stakeholders as a 'common sense' and implies both local and experienced knowledge as well as academic knowledge towards grand challenges. Reflecting the complexity of these current wicked problems, we are living in times of uncertainty. There is no consensus on a precise definition of transdisciplinarity. This lack of clarity stems from the plurality of approaches to defining transdisciplinarity, with specific focal points on problems, actors, knowledge or methods. However, it is important not to narrow its scope: transdisciplinarity is not a research method, but rather a research mode that uses methods from different disciplinary and interdisciplinary scientific fields (especially social and innovation research) and also creates new methods for co-production and collaboration. It encompasses various terminologies, approaches and concepts addressing the participatory elements of public engagement in science, such as socially relevant research, participatory research, action research and citizen science.

Transdisciplinarity means to bridge the gap between science and society, aiming to create a common ownership of problem definitions, research objectives, formats and methods of participation, knowledge integration, evaluation and problem solutions. It enables methodological approaches for societal transformation by translating wicked societal problems into questions that can be scientifically addressed. This involves the generation of common visions and problem solutions.11 By actively involving various stakeholder groups, it integrates both local and academic knowledge on sustainable development challenges, providing more integrative knowledge about transformation potential, transformation needs, possible future scenarios and problem solutions.12,13,14,15,16 While there is growing discourse and commitment as well as established methods and instruments for conducting transdisciplinary research and education, there is still a need to develop support structures for enabling and promoting this research mode within universities.

Collaboration and mutual learning are key! The European ENHANCE Alliance exemplifies how an integrated working process can shed light on the categories and scope of transdisciplinary research at the interface between science and society, enabling communication as well as joint action and research. ENHANCE defines transdisciplinary research as “the interaction between various academic disciplines and relevant non-academic stakeholders with the goal of driving knowledge exchange between science and society to tackle sustainable development challenges and bring about societal transformation”. Initial discussions aimed to develop a shared understanding, foster a common language and consider possible implementations for institutional change at technical universities. This was oriented towards establishing a transdisciplinary research mode at the institutions. To this end, various approaches such as participatory research, co-production, collaboration or co-design – were included. These approaches go hand in hand with the goal of ENHANCE Universities to provide better access to research participation for students and non-academic stakeholders, and to promote the role of the university as a basis for knowledge exchange with society. The negotiated ENHANCE definition of transdisciplinarity is not just another addition to the existing ones within inter- and transdisciplinary communities. It represents a shared and broad understanding of transdisciplinarity, accommodating different approaches and frameworks.


ENHANCE materials

Footnotes
16

Thomas Jahn, Diana  Hummel, Engelbert Schramm, E.: Nachhaltige Wissenschaft im Anthropozän. In: GAIA, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2015, pp. 92–95.

Jürgen Mittelstraß: Transdisziplinarität – wissenschaftliche Zukunft und institutionelle Wirklichkeit. Universitätsverlag, Konstanz 2003.

Helga Nowotny, Peter Scott, Michael Gibbons. M.: Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Polity Press, Cambridge 2001.

Gertrude Hadorn-Hirsch, Holger Hoffmann-Riem, Susette Biber-Klemm, Walter Grossenbacher-Mansuy, Dominique Joye, Christian Pohl, Urs Wiesmann, Elisabeth Zemp (eds.): Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Springer, Dordrecht 2008.

Matthias Bergmann, Thomas Jahn, Tobias Knobloch, Wolfgang Krohn, Cchristian Pohl, Engelbert Schramm (eds.): Methoden transdisziplinärer Forschung – Ein Überblick mit Anwendungsbeispielen. Campus, Frankfurt am Main/New York 2010.

Thomas Jahn, Matthias Bergmann, Florian Keil: Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalisation. In: Ecological Economics. Vol. 79, pp. 1-10.

Undine Giseke, Maria Gerster-Bentaya, Frank Helten, Matthias Kraume, Dieter Scherer, Guido Spars, Abdelaziz Adidi, Fouad Amraoui, Said Berdouz, Mohamed chlaida, Majid Mansour, Mohamed Mdafai (eds.): Urban Agriculture for Growing City Regions. Connecting Urban-Rural Spheres in Casablanca. Routledge, Oxon/ Abingdon/New York 2015.

Matthias Bergmann, Niko Schäpke, Oscar Marg et al.: Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for change. In: Sustain Sci. Vol. 16, 2021, pp. 541–564.

Daniel J. Lang, Arnim Wiek, Matthias Bergmann et al.: Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. In: Sustain Sci. Vol. 7, 2012, pp. 25-43.

David P. M. Lam, Maria Elena Freund, Josefa Kny .et al.: Transdisciplinary research: towards an integrative perspective. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society. Vol. 30, No. 4, 2021, pp. 243-249.

Gertrude Hadorn-Hirsch, Holger Hoffmann-Riem, Susette Biber-Klemm, Walter Grossenbacher-Mansuy, Dominique Joye, Christian Pohl, Urs Wiesmann, Elisabeth Zemp (eds.): Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Springer, Dordrecht 2008.

Roland W. Scholz: Transdisciplinarity. In: Harald Mieg, Klaus Töpfer (eds.): Institutional and Social Innovation for Sustainable Urban Development, Routledge, Abingdon, New York, 2013, pp. 305-322.

Uwe Schneidewind, Mandy Singer-Brodowski: Transformative Wissenschaft: Klimawandel im deutschen Wissenschafts- und Hochschulsystem. Metropolis Verlag, Marburg, 2013.

Uwe Schneidewind, Karoline Augenstein: Three Schools of Transformation Thinking. In: GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society. Vol. 25, No. 2, 2016, pp. 88-93.

Rico Defila, Antonietta Di Giulio: Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen. Eine Methodensammlung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2018.

Kathrin Wieck, Undine Giseke, Silvia Martin Han: Remarks on transdisciplinary research. A3 The methodology. In: Undine Giseke et al. (eds):  Urban Agriculture for Growing City Regions. Connecting Urban-Rural Spheres in Casablanca. Routledge, Oxon/ Abingdon/New York, 2015, pp. 50–51.

Tags

Related Articles
Discussions
0 comments
There are new comments!
Te.ma is in archive mode and new comments are disabled.

No comments yet

te.ma does not use cookies. To comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we however have to inform you that embedded media (e.g. from YouTube) may use cookies. You can find more information in our privacy policy.