te.ma has been inactive since 1 August 2024 until further notice and is in archive mode. All publications are still accessible. However, the comments section is switched off. Existing user accounts will remain accessible until 31 July 2025, new user accounts can no longer be created. Our newsletter will no longer be updated.

SPECIAL INPUT: Katarzyna Rostek

A glossary on transdisciplinarity

The Glossary Living Document is a summary of the ENHANCE research efforts to understand the meaning and correlative elements of the concept of transdisciplinarity within the Alliance. The aim was to develop this glossary structure, spread and improve knowledge and raise awareness of transdisciplinary approaches in research, projects and collaborations towards a greater public. We propose an open, expandable, adaptable and updatable glossary as a space for the continuous collection of experiences, knowledge, competences and skills for transdisciplinary activities.

Transdisciplinarity

Transdisciplinarity is a complex issue.1,2 One reason is that there are various neighbouring terms related to it: Participatory research3, collaboration4, co-production5, and co-design6. Within the technical universities connected through the ENHANCE Alliance, mapping institutional strategies and different practices has revealed multiple ways of understanding, supporting and practising transdisciplinarity, reflecting the different orientations of existing research cultures and governance structures.

In order to facilitate communication and build a common understanding of the subject, we initially set out to develop a glossary of key terms around the topic of transdisciplinarity. The glossary is related to the broad shared ENHANCE definition on transdisciplinarity and immanent part of the mutual learning environment we created with the Alliance on this topic. This evolved into the design of a living document which not only defines concepts and terms, but traces the relationships between them and their evolution. This approach allowed us to harness the value of this diversity by formulating a framework for the Glossary that accommodates the concepts organised according to the proposed logic, as well as references to related literature, internal links and relevant interactions. Below, we present the logical structure of the Glossary, developed through workshops and in-depth interviews with representatives of the ENHANCE Alliance universities. The concepts and definitions used by researchers and practitioners were mapped on a Miro board, which formed the basis for discussions on taxonomies and keywords.

Fig. 1. Glossary structure (source: own research)

The discussion began with an understanding of both the variety of understandings on transdisciplinarity and the basic issues and concepts that are at the core of transdisciplinarity, i.e. the goal patterns of transdisciplinary research, relevant topics and essential types of problems, methodologies, relevant academic and non-academic actors involved and types of knowledges integrated.

Fig. 2. Scope of the transdisciplinarity concept (source: own research)

One of the most important outcomes of transdisciplinarity as a research mode is the creation of new knowledge and its dissemination form. From the perspective of researchers, the elements of knowledge exchange, ways of knowledge production and openness in sharing knowledge with the broader community are extremely important to tackle complex problems for sustainable transformation.

Fig. 3. Integrated knowledge as a product (source: own research)

The design of a transdisciplinary research process also depends on the individual approach of the institution or at least the research team. It differs in the scope of the university governance, guidelines, strategy, but also the approach to the transdisciplinary research process, the individual researcher’s interpretation of the implementation during the research process and the methods and tools used.

Fig. 4. The transdisciplinary research process as a implementation path (source: own research)

It is impossible to talk about transdisciplinarity without considering social impact. The effectiveness of a transdisciplinary project is related to the levels of participation, the form of cooperation between science and society actors and the formats of knowledge integration, all of which must be carefully developed before launching a transdisciplinary project.

Fig. 5. Societal impact as one of the main outcomes (source: own research)

We have defined four broad thematic areas for the Glossary: terms corresponding to the understanding of transdisciplinarity (Fig. 2); integrated knowledge as its product and the element conditioning its development (Fig. 3); the transdisciplinary research process as the main manifestation of its realisation (Fig. 4); and social impact as one of the main outcomes and justification for its global relevance (Fig. 5). This framework provides an open conceptual structure for the ongoing development of the Glossary, its organisation and the transfer of knowledge and experience within the ENHANCE Alliance.


ENHANCE materials

Footnotes
6

Cyrille Rigolot: Transdisciplinarity as a discipline and a way of being: complementarities and creative tensions. Humanities and social sciences communications, 2020, 7(1), pp. 1-5.

Patric Brandt, Anna Ernst, Fabienne Gralla, Christopher Luederitz, Daniel J. Lang, Jens Newig, Florian Reinert, David J. Abson, Henrik von Wehrden: A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological economics, 2013, 92, pp. 1-15.

Toddi A. Steelman, Ana Maria Bogdan, Chrystal Mantyka-Pringle, Lori Bradford, M. G. Reed, S. Baines, T. Fresque-Baxter, J. Jardine, S. Shantz, R. Abu, K. Staples, A. Evan, L. Bharadwaj , G. Strickert, P. Jones, K. Lindenschmidt, G. Poelzer, Delta Dialogue Network: Evaluating transdisciplinary research practices: insights from social network analysis. Sustainability Science, 2021, 16, pp. 631-645.

Alison Specht, Kevin Crowston: Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes. PLoS One, 2022, 17(11),  e0278043.

Merritt Polk: Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures, 2015, 65, pp. 110-122.

Victoria Wibeck, Karin Eliasson: Tina-Simone Neset. Co-creation research for transformative times: Facilitating foresight capacity in view of global sustainability challenges. Environmental Science & Policy, 2022, 128, pp. 290-298.

Tags

Related Articles
Discussions
0 comments
There are new comments!
Te.ma is in archive mode and new comments are disabled.

No comments yet

te.ma does not use cookies. To comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we however have to inform you that embedded media (e.g. from YouTube) may use cookies. You can find more information in our privacy policy.